Breeding Strategies to Optimize Effective Population Size in Low Census Captive Populations: The Case of Gazella cuvieri

• Published in: Animals (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 6; p. 1559
• Main Authors: Ojeda-Marín, Candela, Cervantes, Isabel, Moreno, Eulalia, Goyache, Félix, Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 27.05.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Animal breeding; Animal populations; Animals; Breeding; conservation; effective population size; Endangered & extinct species; Evolution; Extinction; Females; Gazella cuvieri; Genetic diversity; Genetic variability; Males; Mathematical models; Mating; mating designs; Monitoring; Monogamy; Offspring; Polygyny; Population; Population genetics; Population number; Population studies; Populations; small populations; Species extinction; Subpopulations; Variability; Wildlife conservation; Morocco; Spain
• ISSN: 2076-2615; 2076-2615
• DOI: 10.3390/ani11061559

Small-sized animal populations can undergo significant loss of genetic variability that can lead to their extinction. Therefore, studies on animal breeding have focused on mating systems for minimizing the disappearance of genetic variability. The main objective of this study was to compare, using computer simulations, the performance of different breeding schemes to limit the loss of genetic diversity in small-sized populations. This objective was achieved by monitoring the evolution of the effective population size obtained by 23 strategies throughout 20 generations in two populations of Gazella cuvieri. The scenarios were designed with different assumptions, in both reference subpopulations, regarding: the use of parents coancestry or offspring coancestry, the use of their increases or the coefficients themselves, and the number of males and females involved. Computations were performed using an experimental module of Endog v4.9 developed for this purpose. The results of the study showed that strategies for minimizing the coancestry of the parents were better in the short term; however, these strategies were worse in the long term. Minimizing the average coancestry of the offspring was a better approach in the long term. Nevertheless, in both populations, the best results were obtained when both the coancestry of the parents and the coancestry of the offspring were weighted at 5% each and neither males nor females were assumed to contribute to the next generation. In any case, not all strategies had the same evolutionary pattern throughout generations in both populations. The current results show that neither traditional nor new strategies have any general use. Therefore, it is important to carefully test these strategies before applying them to different populations with different breeding needs under different conditions, such as different generation intervals, and different natural breeding systems such as monogamy or polygyny.