Attentional blink in adolescents with varying levels of impulsivity

We explore the temporal attention function in a non-clinical sample of adolescents varying in impulsivity, as assessed with the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. In a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation task, in which two targets (T 1 and T 2) were presented in close temporal proximity among distractors, pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of psychiatric research Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 197 - 205
Main Authors Ray Li, Chiang-shan, Chen, Sue-Huei, Lin, Wei-hao, Yang, Yong-Yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2005
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We explore the temporal attention function in a non-clinical sample of adolescents varying in impulsivity, as assessed with the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. In a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation task, in which two targets (T 1 and T 2) were presented in close temporal proximity among distractors, participants tried to identify T 1 and detect T 2 in one (dual-task) experiment and only to detect T 2 in a second, control (single-task) experiment. The sensitivity of T 2 detection was analyzed using signal detection theory. The attentional blink – the impairment in T 2 detection following the identification of T 1 – was increased in magnitude and protracted in adolescents with high impulsivity, compared with those with low impulsivity. Moreover, a few more participants with high impulsivity appeared to have a blink temporally weighing toward a later time, an observation also made in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an earlier study. Taken together, these findings suggest impairment in temporal attention in adolescents with high impulsivity. As in ADHD children, a gating deficit may play a central role in this attention impairment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3956
1879-1379
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.06.003