Allelic loss studies do not provide evidence for the “endometriosis-as-tumor” theory

To identify consistent genetic changes in endometriosis samples to determine whether endometriosis lesions are true neoplasms. We analyzed ovarian endometriosis lesions for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 12 loci of potential importance (D9S1870, D9S265, D9S270, D9S161, D11S29, D1S199, D8S261, APOA2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 83; no. 4; pp. 1134 - 1143
Main Authors Prowse, Amanda H., Fakis, Giannoulis, Manek, Sanjiv, Churchman, Michael, Edwards, Sarah, Rowan, Andrew, Koninckx, Philippe, Kennedy, Stephen, Tomlinson, Ian P.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To identify consistent genetic changes in endometriosis samples to determine whether endometriosis lesions are true neoplasms. We analyzed ovarian endometriosis lesions for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 12 loci of potential importance (D9S1870, D9S265, D9S270, D9S161, D11S29, D1S199, D8S261, APOA2, PTCH, TP53, D10S541, and D10S1765), including some at which genetic changes were previously reported in endometriosis. Molecular biology laboratory in a university hospital department. Seventeen women with ovarian endometriosis. Laser capture microdissection to separate the endometriotic epithelium, the adjacent endometriotic stroma, and surrounding normal ovarian stromal tissue, followed by DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers. Fluorescence-based quantitation for the LOH analysis. We identified LOH in only one lesion at one locus (D8S261). Our data do not support the hypothesis that ovarian endometriosis is a true neoplasm.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.982