Promoter-proximal nucleosomes attenuate RNA polymerase II transcription through TFIID

• Published in: The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 299; no. 7; p. 104928
• Main Authors: Fisher, Michael J., Luse, Donal S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2023; American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• Subjects: Animals; Base Sequence; histone methylation; Histones - metabolism; Humans; Lysine - genetics; nucleosome; Nucleosomes - genetics; promoter; RNA polymerase II; RNA Polymerase II - genetics; RNA Polymerase II - metabolism; TATA Box; TATA-Box Binding Protein - genetics; TATA-Box Binding Protein - metabolism; TFIID; Transcription Factor TFIID - genetics; Transcription Factor TFIID - metabolism; Transcription Factors - metabolism; Transcription, Genetic; AML; histone methylation; TFIID; NPE; TBP; TSS; H3K4me3; nucleosome; promoter; PIC; RNA polymerase II; pol II
• ISSN: 0021-9258; 1083-351X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104928

A nucleosome is typically positioned with its proximal edge (NPE) ∼50 bp downstream from the transcription start site of metazoan RNA polymerase II promoters. This +1 nucleosome has distinctive characteristics, including the presence of variant histone types and trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4. To address the role of these features in transcription complex assembly, we generated templates with four different promoters and nucleosomes located at a variety of downstream positions, which were transcribed in vitro using HeLa nuclear extracts. Two promoters lacked TATA elements, but all supported strong initiation from a single transcription start site. In contrast to results with minimal in vitro systems based on the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TATA promoter templates with a +51 NPE were transcriptionally inhibited in extracts; activity continuously increased as the nucleosome was moved downstream to +100. Inhibition was much more pronounced for the TATA-less promoters: +51 NPE templates were inactive, and substantial activity was only seen with the +100 NPE templates. Substituting the histone variants H2A.Z, H3.3, or both did not eliminate the inhibition. However, addition of excess TBP restored activity on nucleosomal templates with TATA promoters, even with an NPE at +20. Remarkably, nucleosomal templates with histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 are active with an NPE at +51 for both TATA and TATA-less promoters. Our results strongly suggest that the +1 nucleosome interferes with promoter recognition by TFIID. This inhibition can be overcome with TBP alone at TATA promoters or through positive interactions with histone modifications and TFIID.