An in-depth comparison of well-being among Latinx and non-Latinx White adults: A cautionary tale

• Published in: Preventive medicine reports Vol. 24; p. 101513
• Main Authors: Rodriguez Espinosa, Patricia, Patel, Michele L., King, Abby C., Campero, Ines, Freeman, Mark, Garcia, Dulce M., Winter, Sandra J., Heaney, Catherine A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.12.2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Latino/Hispanic/Latinx; Propensity score matching; Racial/ethnic differences; Regular; Well-being; Well-being correlates; Propensity score matching; Racial/ethnic differences; Well-being; Latino/Hispanic/Latinx; Well-being correlates
• ISSN: 2211-3355; 2211-3355
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101513

•Optimizing Latinos’ health and well-being is a crucial preventive medicine effort.•Understanding group differences can inform future research and public health efforts.•Latinos vs non-Latinos differed in physical health, stress, and religiosity.•Matched Latinos samples also differed significantly in four well-being domains.•Our methods offer guidance for examining multi-ethnic differences in well-being. Understanding how to optimize the health and well-being of Latinxs is crucial and will aid in informing actions to address inequities. Latinxs’ unique cultural backgrounds and lived experiences could have implications for their well-being, which may differ from other racial/ethnic groups. We compared overall and domain-specific well-being and their socio-demographic correlates among two samples of Latinxs and a sample of non-Latinx Whites. Cross-sectional samples were independently drawn from the Stanford WELL Initiative (n = 217 Latinxs, n = 943 non-Latinx Whites) and the On the Move Trial (n = 238 Latinxs), both recruiting in Northern California. Well-being was assessed using the Stanford WELL scale, a novel multifaceted measure. Propensity score matching and mixed effect regressions were employed to compare well-being between samples. Overall well-being levels did not differ between groups. However, when examining constituent domains of well-being, several differences were found. Both Latinx samples reported experiencing more stress, having worse physical health, and being more religious than did the matched non-Latinx White sample. However, on four other well-being domains, only one of the Latinx samples differed from the non-Latinx White sample. Moreover, the two Latinx samples differed from each other in four out of nine domains examined. When evaluating well-being across racial/ethnic groups, we recommend employing multidimensional measures and multiple samples to promote greater confidence in the conclusions. This approach can better inform future research and the tailoring of public health efforts by furthering our understanding of the nature of group well-being differences. Our methods offer a blueprint for similar studies examining well-being in multi-ethnic groups.