Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

• Published in: Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology Vol. 6; no. 2; p. 43
• Main Authors: Aidar, Felipe J., Clemente, Filipe Manuel, Matos, Dihogo Gama de, Marçal, Anderson Carlos, de Souza, Raphael Fabrício, Moreira, Osvaldo Costa, Almeida-Neto, Paulo Francisco de, Vilaça-Alves, José, Garrido, Nuno Domingos, dos Santos, Jymmys Lopes, Jeffreys, Ian, Neto, Frederico Ribeiro, Reis, Victor Machado, Cabral, Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco, Rosemann, Thomas, Knechtle, Beat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 15.05.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Athletes; Hypotheses; Investigations; Load; Muscle function; Paralympic Games; Powerlifting Paralympic; sticking point; strength indicators; Warm up (exercise); Brazil
• ISSN: 2411-5142; 2411-5142
• DOI: 10.3390/jfmk6020043

Background: The sticking region is considered an intervening factor in the performance of the bench press with high loads. Objective: To evaluate the strength indicators in the sticking point region in Powerlifting Paralympic athletes. Methods: Twelve Brazilian Powerlifting Paralympic athletes performed maximum isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), time at MIF, velocity, dynamic time in sticking, and surface electromyography in several distances from the bar to the chest. Results: For velocity, there was a difference between the pre-sticking and sticking region (1.98 ± 0.32 and 1.30 ± 0.43, p = 0.039) and dynamic time between the pre-sticking and the sticking region (0.40 ± 0.16 and 0.97 ± 0.37, p = 00.021). In static test for the MIF, differences were found between 5.0 cm and 15.0 cm (CI 95% 784; 1088; p = 0.010) and between 10.0 cm and 5.0 cm (CI 95% 527; 768; p < 0.001). Regarding the RFD, differences were found (CI 95% 938; 1240; p = 0.004) between 5.0 cm and 25.0 cm and between 10.0 cm and 25.0 cm (CI 95% 513; 732; p < 0.001). In relation to time, there were differences between 5.0 cm and 15.0 cm (CI 95% 0.330; 0.515; p < 0.001), 5.0 cm, and 25.0 cm (CI 95% 0.928; 1.345; p = 0.001), 10.0 cm and 15.0 cm (p < 0.05) and 15.0 cm and 25.0 cm (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the muscles in electromyography, although the triceps showed the highest muscle activation values. Conclusions: The maximum isometric force, rate of force development, time, velocity, and dynamic time had lower values, especially in the initial and intermediate phases in the sticking region.