Training at non‐damaging intensities facilitates recovery from muscle atrophy

ABSTRACT Introduction: Resistance training promotes recovery from muscle atrophy, but optimum training programs have not been established. We aimed to determine the optimum training intensity for muscle atrophy. Methods: Mice recovering from atrophied muscles after 2 weeks of tail suspension underwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMuscle & nerve Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 243 - 253
Main Authors Itoh, Yuta, Murakami, Taro, Mori, Tomohiro, Agata, Nobuhide, Kimura, Nahoko, Inoue‐Miyazu, Masumi, Hayakawa, Kimihide, Hirano, Takayuki, Sokabe, Masahiro, Kawakami, Keisuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction: Resistance training promotes recovery from muscle atrophy, but optimum training programs have not been established. We aimed to determine the optimum training intensity for muscle atrophy. Methods: Mice recovering from atrophied muscles after 2 weeks of tail suspension underwent repeated isometric training with varying joint torques 50 times per day. Results: Muscle recovery assessed by maximal isometric contraction and myofiber cross‐sectional areas (CSAs) were facilitated at 40% and 60% maximum contraction strength (MC), but at not at 10% and 90% MC. At 60% and 90% MC, damaged and contained smaller diameter fibers were observed. Activation of myogenic satellite cells and a marked increase in myonuclei were observed at 40%, 60%, and 90% MC. Conclusions: The increases in myofiber CSAs were likely caused by increased myonuclei formed through fusion of resistance‐induced myofibers with myogenic satellite cells. These data indicate that resistance training without muscle damage facilitates efficient recovery from atrophy. Muscle Nerve 55: 243–253, 2017
Bibliography:This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI [Grant‐in‐Aids for Challenging Exploratory Research: 25560254, 26560288, and 16K12938; for Scientific Research (C): 26350647 and 15K01436, for Scientific Research (B): 15H03042].
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.25218