Are classification and phytopathological diversity compatible in Xanthomonas?

The genus Xanthomonas is characterized by its phytopathogenic diversity and the host specificity of its members. In the past, the classification of the members of this genus has been based primarily on the criterion of host specificity. This has led to a classification system which focused only on n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 77 - 82
Main Authors Vauterin, L, Swings, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Oxford University Press 01.08.1997
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The genus Xanthomonas is characterized by its phytopathogenic diversity and the host specificity of its members. In the past, the classification of the members of this genus has been based primarily on the criterion of host specificity. This has led to a classification system which focused only on naming phytopathogenic variants on different hosts. Extensive taxonomic examination of Xanthomonas has shown that the phytopathogenic specialization of the bacteria is not correlated with the actual relationships within the genus. Based upon total genomic DNA homology, the genus has been reclassified into 20 species. At present, non-pathogenic xanthomonads are frequently isolated from plant material. As these strains often cannot be classified to existing species, it becomes clear that the diversity of the genus is much greater than expected from the phytopathogenic subpopulation, which has been the primary subject in the past. The example of Xanthomonas also illustrates that attempts to divide bacterial populations into discrete taxa conflict with the actual continuous nature of biodiversity
Bibliography:1997063362
H20
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1367-5435
1476-5535
DOI:10.1038/sj.jim.2900433