Gambling Among Finnish 14–16-Year-Old Adolescents Before (2008–2009), During (2010–2011), and After (2013–2017) Setting the Legal Age Limit of 18 for Gambling and the Role of Socio-Economic Status

• Published in: Journal of gambling studies Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 1243 - 1256
• Main Authors: Latvala, Tiina, Lintonen, Tomi, Luopa, Pauliina, Raisamo, Susanna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescents; Community and Environmental Psychology; Contingency tables; Economic status; Economics; Gambling; Health promotion; Inequality; Legal age; Legislation; Lotteries; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Monopolies; Original Paper; Psychiatry; Public health; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Teenagers; Finland; Trend; Socio-economic status; Gambling; Legislation; Inequality
• ISSN: 1573-3602; 1050-5350; 1573-3602
• DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10091-6

Legislation prohibiting minors from engaging in gambling is a gambling policy measure set to protect adolescents from the harmful effects of gambling. The Finnish gambling system is based on a state monopoly, regulated by the Lotteries Act. After an amendment to the Lotteries Act, the new minimum legal gambling age was raised to 18 years old between 2010 and 2011. The main purpose of this study was to discover how the amendment to the act altered adolescents’ gambling (14–16-year-olds) and to examine whether the amendment decreased socio-economic differences. Adolescents gambling was studied before (2008–2009), during (2010–2011), and after (2013–2017) the age limit of gambling was raised in Finland. The study based on five waves (2008–2009, 2010–2011, 2013, 2015, 2017) of the national repeated cross-sectional School Health Promotion Study. Cross-tabulations where gambling was studied by study year and socio-economic status (SES) were formulated, and the statistical differences were studied by using χ 2 -tests. Percentage change in gambling frequency was also examined by study year and SES. Study years were analyzed separately to model the weekly gambling via logistic regression models. Adolescent gambling significantly decreased over time. It appears that raising the legal gambling age had a permanent effect on under-aged gambling. However, differences in gambling by adolescents’ family’s SES increased during the study period, indicating widening inequalities in gambling among adolescents. Diminishing inequalities in adolescent gambling is likely to require both societal action and consensus on adolescent gambling being a significant social and public health concern.