What methods are currently available for incorporating implementation considerations within the economic evaluation of health technologies? A scoping review

• Published in: Health research policy and systems Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 134 - 13
• Main Authors: Heggie, Robert, Boyd, Kathleen, Kamaruzaman, Hanin, Wu, Olivia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 30.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Biomedical Technology - economics; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Economic aspects; Economic evaluation; Health; Health Policy; Health technology assessment; Humans; Implementation; Medical care, Cost of; Research Design; Review; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - economics; United Kingdom; Implementation; Health technology assessment; Economic evaluation
• ISSN: 1478-4505; 1478-4505
• DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01220-9

When clinically effective, cost-effective health interventions are not fully implemented in clinical practice, population health suffers. Economic factors are among the most commonly cited reasons for suboptimal implementation. Despite this, implementation and economic evaluation are not routinely performed in conjunction with one another. This review sought to identify and describe what methods are available for researchers to incorporate implementation within economic evaluation, how these methods differ, when they should be used, and where gaps remain. We conducted a scoping review using systematic methods. A pearl-growing approach was used to identify studies. References and citations were identified using Web of Science and Scopus. We included for review any study that contained terms relating to economic evaluation and a series of implementation-related terms in the title or abstract. The search was conducted and validated using two independent researchers. Our review identified 42 unique studies that included a methodology for combining implementation and economic evaluation. The methods identified could be categorized into four broad themes: (i) policy cost-effectiveness approach (11 studies), (ii) value of information and value of implementation approach (16 studies), (iii) mixed methods approach (6 studies), and (iv) costing approach (9 studies). We identified a trend over time from methods that adopted the policy cost-effectiveness approach to methods that considered the trade-off between the value of information and value of implementation. More recently, mixed methods approaches to incorporate economic evaluation and implementation have been developed, alongside methods to define, measure and cost individual components of the implementation process for use in economic evaluation. Our review identified a range of methods currently available for researchers considering implementation alongside economic evaluation. There is no single method or tool that can incorporate all the relevant issues to fully incorporate implementation within an economic evaluation. Instead, there are a suite of tools available, each of which can be used to answer a specific question relating to implementation. Researchers, reimbursement agencies and national and local decision-makers need to consider how best to utilize these tools to improve implementation.