OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies

Biological ontologies are used to organize, curate and interpret the vast quantities of data arising from biological experiments. While this works well when using a single ontology, integrating multiple ontologies can be problematic, as they are developed independently, which can lead to incompatibi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation Vol. 2021
Main Authors Jackson, Rebecca, Matentzoglu, Nicolas, Overton, James A, Vita, Randi, Balhoff, James P, Buttigieg, Pier Luigi, Carbon, Seth, Courtot, Melanie, Diehl, Alexander D, Dooley, Damion M, Duncan, William D, Harris, Nomi L, Haendel, Melissa A, Lewis, Suzanna E, Natale, Darren A, Osumi-Sutherland, David, Ruttenberg, Alan, Schriml, Lynn M, Smith, Barry, Stoeckert Jr, Christian J, Vasilevsky, Nicole A, Walls, Ramona L, Zheng, Jie, Mungall, Christopher J, Peters, Bjoern
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 26.10.2021
Oxford University Press - International Society for Biocuration
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biological ontologies are used to organize, curate and interpret the vast quantities of data arising from biological experiments. While this works well when using a single ontology, integrating multiple ontologies can be problematic, as they are developed independently, which can lead to incompatibilities. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry was created to address this by facilitating the development, harmonization, application and sharing of ontologies, guided by a set of overarching principles. One challenge in reaching these goals was that the OBO principles were not originally encoded in a precise fashion, and interpretation was subjective. Here, we show how we have addressed this by formally encoding the OBO principles as operational rules and implementing a suite of automated validation checks and a dashboard for objectively evaluating each ontology’s compliance with each principle. This entailed a substantial effort to curate metadata across all ontologies and to coordinate with individual stakeholders. We have applied these checks across the full OBO suite of ontologies, revealing areas where individual ontologies require changes to conform to our principles. Our work demonstrates how a sizable, federated community can be organized and evaluated on objective criteria that help improve overall quality and interoperability, which is vital for the sustenance of the OBO project and towards the overall goals of making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). Database URL http://obofoundry.org/
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
AC02-05CH11231
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
ISSN:1758-0463
1758-0463
DOI:10.1093/database/baab069