Use of focus group methodology to develop an asthma self-management program useful for community-based medical practices

Health education programs developed in academic medical centers are not optimally disseminated to community clinical settings. Strategies are needed to translate the findings of research on health education programs into programs useful in a wide range of health care settings. Focus group techniques...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth education quarterly Vol. 20; no. 3; p. 421
Main Authors Kohler, C L, Dolce, J J, Manzella, B A, Higgins, D, Brooks, C M, Richards, Jr, J M, Bailey, W C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.10.1993
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Health education programs developed in academic medical centers are not optimally disseminated to community clinical settings. Strategies are needed to translate the findings of research on health education programs into programs useful in a wide range of health care settings. Focus group techniques were used to provide data for revising a successful university-based asthma self-management program to make it more practical for use by community physicians. Physicians representing a variety of specialties attended the sessions and provided feedback on the utility of various components of the original program. The discussions revealed that many physicians felt they did not have the time or resources to conduct the original program and identified elements viewed as impractical. This physician input contributed significantly to the development of a revised program with a briefer, less costly intervention. The revised program was later evaluated by focus group participants. Eighty-eight percent of those who evaluated the revised program agreed they would be able and willing to use the program in their own practices. As a formative evaluation tool, the focus group technique made available useful information that would have been difficult to obtain through evaluation forms alone.
ISSN:0195-8402
DOI:10.1177/109019819302000311