Exploring the impacts of different fasting and refeeding regimes on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.): growth performance, histopathological study, and expression levels of some muscle growth-related genes

• Published in: Fish physiology and biochemistry Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 973 - 989
• Main Authors: Elbialy, Zizy I., Gamal, Shrouk, Al-Hawary, Ibrahim I., Shukry, Mustafa, Salah, Abdallah S., Aboshosha, Ali A., Assar, Doaa H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.08.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animal Anatomy; Animal Biochemistry; Animal Physiology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Body weight; Fasting; Fish; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Freshwater fishes; Gene expression; Genes; Histology; Histopathology; Insulin-like growth factor I; Life Sciences; Marine fishes; Morphology; Muscles; Myogenin; Myostatin; Oreochromis niloticus; Restoration; Starvation; Tilapia; Zoology; Myostatin; Fasting; Histopathology; Nile tilapia; Growth-related genes
• ISSN: 0920-1742; 1573-5168
• DOI: 10.1007/s10695-022-01094-0

The current study investigated how different fasting and refeeding regimes would impact Nile tilapia growth performance, histopathological examination, and gene expression of myostatin, myogenin, GH , IGF-1 , and NPYa . Nile tilapia fish ( n  = 120) were randomly allocated into four groups, including the control group fed on a basal diet for 6 weeks (F6), group A starved for 1 week and then refed for 5 weeks (S1F5), group B starved for 2 weeks and then refed for 4 weeks (S2F4), while group C starved for 4 weeks and then refed for 2 weeks (S4F2). Fasting provoked a decrease in body weight coincided with more extended starvation periods. Also, it induced muscle and liver histological alterations; the severity was correlated with the length of fasting periods. Gene expression levels of GH , MSTN , MYOG , and NPYa were significantly increased, while IGF1 was markedly depressed in fasted fish compared to the control group. Interestingly, refeeding after well-planned short fasting period (S1F5) modulated the histopathological alterations. To some extent, these changes were restored after refeeding. Restored IGF-I and opposing fasting expression profiles of the genes mentioned above thus recovered weights almost like the control group and achieved satisfactory growth compensation. Conversely, refeeding following more extended fasting periods failed to restore body weight. In conclusion, refeeding after fasting can induce a compensatory response. Still, the restoration capacity is dependent on the length of fasting and refeeding periods through exhibiting differential morphological structure and expressions pattern for muscle and growth-related genes. Graphical abstract