Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government

New Public Governance assumes that co-production leads to beneficial outcomes, such as increased efficiency and better citizen well-being. However, few empirical studies have documented these outcomes, and some have demonstrated that the assumed outcomes do not emerge. This study establishes that co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLocal government studies Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 169 - 185
Main Authors Brix, Jacob, Krogstrup, Hanne Kathrine, Mortensen, Nanna Moeller
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 03.03.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
co-evaluation
Co-production
effects
Governance
Local government
outcomes
Production
programme theory
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:New Public Governance assumes that co-production leads to beneficial outcomes, such as increased efficiency and better citizen well-being. However, few empirical studies have documented these outcomes, and some have demonstrated that the assumed outcomes do not emerge. This study establishes that co-production is a complex, social phenomenon, which implies that there cannot be a clear cause-effect relationship between co-production activities and their outcomes. To qualify and enable further empirical investigation of the outcomes of co-production, the study proposes that contribution analysis should be applied as an appropriate evaluation paradigm to theoretically reduce complexity and define a generic programme theory for co-production. The study also discusses how the creation and operationalisation of a local co-production programme theory can take place to evaluate the relationship between co-production initiatives and outcomes on a localised level. Finally, directions are provided for how the outcomes of co-production can be co-evaluated with citizens.
ISSN:0300-3930
1743-9388
DOI:10.1080/03003930.2019.1702530