Validation and application of dynamic biplane radiography to study in vivo ankle joint kinematics during high-demand activities

Ankle ligament injuries are the most common musculoskeletal injury in physically active populations. Failure to restore native kinematics post-injury often leads to long-term consequences including chronic instability and arthritis. Using traditional motion capture, it is difficult to distinguish in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomechanics Vol. 103; p. 109696
Main Authors Pitcairn, Samuel, Kromka, Joseph, Hogan, MaCalus, Anderst, William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 16.04.2020
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ankle ligament injuries are the most common musculoskeletal injury in physically active populations. Failure to restore native kinematics post-injury often leads to long-term consequences including chronic instability and arthritis. Using traditional motion capture, it is difficult to distinguish independent motions of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints to assess the effects of injury, surgical repair, and rehabilitation on ankle joint complex (AJC) kinematics. Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of dynamic biplane radiography for determining in vivo AJC kinematics and arthrokinematics, and to identify sport-related movements that require the largest AJC range of motion (ROM) during support. Two subjects had three to five 1.0 mm diameter tantalum beads implanted into the tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneus during lateral ankle ligament repair. Six months after surgery, the subjects executed seven movements while biplane radiographs were collected. Bone motion was tracked using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) as a “gold standard”, and compared to a volumetric CT model-based tracking algorithm that matched digitally reconstructed radiographs to the original biplane radiographs. Over all movements, the average tibiotalar, subtalar and tibiofibular RMS errors were 0.5 mm ± 0.2 mm, 0.8 mm ± 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm ± 0.3 mm in translation and 1.4° ± 0.4°, 1.5° ± 0.5° and 1.7° ± 0.6° in rotation, respectively. Tibiotalar joint space was determined with an average precision of 0.5 mm. ROM results indicate that jumping and a forward-to-backward push-off movement are the best of the seven sport-related movements evaluated for eliciting full ROM kinematics.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0021-9290
1873-2380
1873-2380
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109696