Hypotension during propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective exploratory analysis and meta-analysis

• Published in: British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 128; no. 4; pp. 610 - 622
• Main Authors: Sneyd, J. Robert, Absalom, Anthony R., Barends, Clemens R.M., Jones, Jordan B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Cardiovascular; colonoscopy; Colonoscopy - adverse effects; endoscopy; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects; hypotension; Hypotension - chemically induced; Hypotension - epidemiology; midazolam; Midazolam - adverse effects; propofol; Propofol - adverse effects; Retrospective Studies; sedation; hypotension; endoscopy; midazolam; propofol; colonoscopy; sedation
• ISSN: 0007-0912; 1471-6771
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044

Intraoperative and postoperative hypotension occur commonly and are associated with organ injury and poor outcomes. Changes in arterial blood pressure (BP) during procedural sedation are not well described. Individual patient data from five trials of propofol sedation for colonoscopy and a clinical database were pooled and explored with logistic and linear regression. A literature search and focused meta-analysis compared the incidence of hypotension with propofol and alternative forms of procedural sedation. Hypotensive episodes were characterised by the original authors' definitions (typically systolic BP <90 mm Hg). In pooled individual patient data (n=939), 36% of procedures were associated with episodes of hypotension. Longer periods of propofol sedation and larger propofol doses were associated with longer-lasting and more-profound hypotension. Amongst 380 patients for whom individual BP measurements were available, 107 (28%) experienced systolic BP <90 mm Hg for >5 min, and in 89 (23%) the episodes exceeded 10 min. Meta-analysis of 18 RCTs identified an increased risk ratio for the development of hypotension in procedures where propofol was used compared with the use of etomidate (two studies; n=260; risk ratio [RR] 2.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.37–2.92]; P=0.0003), remimazolam (one study; n=384; RR 2.15 [1.61–2.87]; P=0.0001), midazolam (14 studies; n=2218; RR 1.46 [1.18–1.79]; P=0.0004), or all benzodiazepines (15 studies; n=2602; 1.67 [1.41–1.98]; P<0.00001). Hypotension was less likely with propofol than with dexmedetomidine (one study; n=60; RR 0.24 [0.09–0.62]; P=0.003). Hypotension is common during propofol sedation for colonoscopy and of a magnitude and duration associated with harm in surgical patients.