Permanent damage or temporary silencing of retrosplenial cortex impairs the expression of a negative patterning discrimination

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory Vol. 163; p. 107033
• Main Authors: Fournier, Danielle I., Todd, Travis P., Bucci, David J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2019
• Subjects: Animals; Auditory Perception - physiology; Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology; Cerebral Cortex - injuries; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; Conditioning, Classical - physiology; Discrimination Learning - physiology; Male; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Visual Perception - physiology
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107033

•Pretraining lesions of retrosplenial cortex do not impair learning a negative pattering discrimination.•However, lesions or temporary silencing of retrosplenial cortex impairs the expression negative patterning.•This pattern of findings suggests that retrosplenial cortex is normally involved in forming configural representations. The retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is positioned at the interface between cortical sensory regions and the hippocampal/parahippocampal memory system. As such, it has been theorized that RSC may have a fundamental role in linking sensory stimuli together in the service of forming complex representations. To test this, three experiments were carried out to determine the effects of RSC damage or temporary inactivation on learning or performing a negative patterning discrimination. In this procedure, two conditioned stimuli are reinforced when they are presented individually (i.e., stimulus elements) but are non-reinforced when they are presented simultaneously as a compound stimulus. Normal rats successfully discriminate between the two types of trials as evidenced by more responding to the elements compared to the compound stimulus. This is thought to reflect the formation of a configural representation of the compound stimulus; that is, the two cues are linked together in such a fashion that the compound stimulus is a wholly different, unique stimulus. Permanent lesions of RSC made prior to training (Experiment 1) had no effect on learning the discrimination. However, lesions (Experiment 2) or temporary chemogenetic inactivation (Experiment 3) of RSC made after training impaired subsequent performance of the discrimination. We argue that this pattern of results indicates that RSC may normally be involved in forming the configural representations manifested in negative patterning, but that absent the RSC, other brain systems or structures can compensate sufficiently to result in normal behavior.