Challenges of conducting a remote behavioral weight loss study: Lessons learned and a practical guide

• Published in: Contemporary clinical trials Vol. 108; p. 106522
• Main Authors: Hu, Lu, Illiano, Paige, Pompeii, Mary Lou, Popp, Collin J., Kharmats, Anna Y., Curran, Margaret, Perdomo, Katherine, Chen, Shirley, Bergman, Michael, Segal, Eran, Sevick, Mary Ann
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2021
• Subjects: Behavioral intervention; COVID-19; Humans; Lessons learned; Lifestyle intervention; mHealth; Obesity; SARS-CoV-2; Technology; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Text Messaging; Weight Loss; Obesity; Lessons learned; Telehealth; Technology; Lifestyle intervention; Behavioral intervention; mHealth
• ISSN: 1551-7144; 1559-2030
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106522

To describe challenges and lessons learned in conducting a remote behavioral weight loss trial. The Personal Diet Study is an ongoing randomized clinical trial which aims to compare two mobile health (mHealth) weight loss approaches, standardized diet vs. personalized feedback, on glycemic response. Over a six-month period, participants attended dietitian-led group meetings via remote videoconferencing and were encouraged to self-monitor dietary intake using a smartphone app. Descriptive statistics were used to report adherence to counseling sessions and self-monitoring. Challenges were tracked during weekly project meetings. Challenges in connecting to and engaging in the videoconferencing sessions were noted. To address these issues, we provided a step-by-step user manual and video tutorials regarding use of WebEx, encouraged alternative means to join sessions, and sent reminder emails/texts about the WebEx sessions and asking participants to join sessions early. Self-monitoring app-related issue included inability to find specific foods in the app database. To overcome this, the study team incorporated commonly consumed foods as “favorites” in the app database, provided a manual and video tutorials regarding use of the app and checked the self-monitoring app dashboard weekly to identify nonadherent participants and intervened as appropriate. Among 135 participants included in the analysis, the median attendance rate for the 14 remote sessions was 85.7% (IQR: 64.3%–92.9%). Experience and lessons shared in this report may provide critical and timely guidance to other behavioral researchers and interventionists seeking to adapt behavioral counseling programs for remote delivery in the age of COVID-19.