Frame-of-Reference Training Effectiveness: Effects of Goal Orientation and Self-Efficacy on Affective, Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Transfer Outcomes

Empirical evidence supporting frame-of-reference (FOR) training as an effective intervention for calibrating raters is convincing. Yet very little is known about who does better or worse in FOR training. We conducted a field study of how motivational factors influence affective, cognitive, and behav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied psychology Vol. 95; no. 6; pp. 1181 - 1191
Main Authors Dierdorff, Erich C, Surface, Eric A, Brown, Kenneth G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Psychological Association 01.11.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Empirical evidence supporting frame-of-reference (FOR) training as an effective intervention for calibrating raters is convincing. Yet very little is known about who does better or worse in FOR training. We conducted a field study of how motivational factors influence affective, cognitive, and behavioral learning outcomes, as well as near transfer indexed by achieving professional certification. Relying on goal orientation theory, we hypothesized effects for 3 goal orientations: learning, prove performance, and avoid performance. Results were generally supportive across learning outcomes and transfer. Findings further supported a hypothesized interaction between learning self-efficacy and avoid performance goal orientation, such that higher levels of learning self-efficacy mitigated the negative effects of higher performance avoid tendencies. (Contains 3 figures, 3 tables, and 5 footnotes.)
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/a0020856