Portal vein reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation using cryopreserved vein grafts

No data are available for the management of venous jump or interposition conduits for portal vein (PV) reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The feasibility of using cryopreserved vein grafts as PV conduits was examined. Cryopreserved vein (n = 23) was used as a patch, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLiver transplantation Vol. 12; no. 8; pp. 1233 - 1236
Main Authors Sugawara, Yasuhiko, Makuuchi, Masatoshi, Tamura, Sumihito, Matsui, Yuichi, Kaneko, Junichi, Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, Imamura, Hiroshi, Kokudo, Norihiro, Motomura, Noboru, Takamoto, Shinichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.08.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:No data are available for the management of venous jump or interposition conduits for portal vein (PV) reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The feasibility of using cryopreserved vein grafts as PV conduits was examined. Cryopreserved vein (n = 23) was used as a patch, interposition, or jump graft. The patency results were compared with those of anastomosis without vein patch (n = 217) or those with vein autografts (n = 10). The 5‐yr primary and secondary patency rates of the cryopreserved vein grafts were 58% and 79%, respectively. In conclusion, our data indicate that the use of cryopreserved vein grafts should be limited as conduits in PV reconstruction in adult LDLT. Liver Transpl 12:1233‐1236, 2006. © 2006 AASLD.
Bibliography:Telephone: 81‐3‐3815‐5411; FAX: 81‐3‐5684‐3989
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1527-6465
1527-6473
DOI:10.1002/lt.20786