Evaluation of Genomic Selection Training Population Designs and Genotyping Strategies in Plant Breeding Programs Using Simulation

ABSTRACT Genomic selection offers great potential for increasing the rate of genetic improvement in plant breeding programs. This research used simulation to evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for genotyping and phenotyping to enable genomic selection in early generation individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop science Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 1476 - 1488
Main Authors Hickey, John M., Dreisigacker, Susanne, Crossa, Jose, Hearne, Sarah, Babu, Raman, Prasanna, Boddupalli M., Grondona, Martin, Zambelli, Andres, Windhausen, Vanessa S., Mathews, Ky, Gorjanc, Gregor
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison The Crop Science Society of America, Inc 01.07.2014
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Genomic selection offers great potential for increasing the rate of genetic improvement in plant breeding programs. This research used simulation to evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for genotyping and phenotyping to enable genomic selection in early generation individuals (e.g., F2) in breeding programs involving biparental or similar (e.g., backcross or top cross) populations. By using phenotypes that were previously collected in other biparental populations, selection decisions could be made without waiting for phenotypes that pertain directly to the selection candidate to be collected, a process that would take at least three growing seasons. If these phenotypes were collected in biparental populations that were closely related to the selection candidates, only a small number of markers (e.g., 200–500) and a small number of phenotypes (e.g., 1000) were needed to achieve effective accuracy of estimated breeding values. If these phenotypes were collected in biparental populations that were not closely related to the selection candidates, as many as 10,000 markers and 5000 to 20,000 phenotypes were needed. Increasing marker density beyond 10,000 markers did not show benefit and in some scenarios reduced the accuracy of prediction. This study provides a guide, enabling resource allocation to be optimized between genotyping and phenotyping investment dependent on the population under development.
Bibliography:All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
ISSN:0011-183X
1435-0653
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0195