Does new photosensitizer improve photodynamic therapy in advanced esophageal carcinoma?
Background and Objective Polyhematoporphyrin (Photosan®) as sensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in advanced esophageal cancer carry the risk of prolonged photosensitivity of the skin. New sensitizers such as 5‐aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) with low rates of skin phototoxicity appear to be promis...
Saved in:
Published in | Lasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 323 - 327 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.01.2001
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Objective
Polyhematoporphyrin (Photosan®) as sensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in advanced esophageal cancer carry the risk of prolonged photosensitivity of the skin. New sensitizers such as 5‐aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) with low rates of skin phototoxicity appear to be promising alternatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ALA compared to Photosan® for PDT in advanced esophageal carcinoma regarding phototoxicity of the skin, reduction of dysphagia, tumor stenosis, and tumor length and Karnovsky performance status.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
After diagnostic work‐up, photosensitization was done in 22 patients with ALA (60 mg/kg body weight, oral, 6–8 hours prior to PDT) and in 27 patients with Photosan® (2 mg/kg body weight, i.v., 48 hours before PDT). The light dose was calculated as 300 J/cm fibre tip. Light at 630 nm was applied using a pumped dye laser. In both groups, additional hyperbaric oxygenation was applied at a level of 2 absolute atmospheric pressure.
Results
Improvement regarding dysphagia, stenosis diameter, and tumor length could be obtained in both treatment arms with a significant difference in favour of the Photosan®‐group, P = 0.02; P = 0.0000; and P = 0.000014, respectively. The Karnovsky performance status also improved in both groups and showed no significant difference (P = 0.12). The median survival time for the ALA‐group was 8.0 months, compared with 9.0 months for the Photosan® group. No sunburn or other major treatment related complication occurred in both treatment arms. Thirty‐day mortality was 0%.
Conclusion
Despite the limitations of a non‐randomized study, photosensitzation with Photosan® seems to be more effective in PDT of advanced esophageal carcinoma compared to ALA. Lasers Surg. Med. 29:323–327, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-KG7B51TK-2 istex:A05CFAAC90D1F91B67DC4107DB1199CEA7920F8A ArticleID:LSM1124 |
ISSN: | 0196-8092 1096-9101 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lsm.1124 |