Parametric models for accelerated and long-term survival: a comment on proportional hazards

The Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) is routinely used in clinical trials, but it may encounter serious difficulties with departures from the proportional hazards assumption, even when the departures are not readily detected by commonly used diagnostics. We consider the Gamel–Boag (GB) model, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 21; no. 21; pp. 3279 - 3289
Main Authors Frankel, Paul, Longmate, Jeffrey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 15.11.2002
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI10.1002/sim.1273

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) is routinely used in clinical trials, but it may encounter serious difficulties with departures from the proportional hazards assumption, even when the departures are not readily detected by commonly used diagnostics. We consider the Gamel–Boag (GB) model, a log‐normal model for accelerated failure in which a proportion of subjects are long‐term survivors. When the CPH model is fit to simulated data generated from this model, the results can range from gross overstatement of the effect size, to a situation where increasing follow‐up may cause a decline in power. We implement a fitting algorithm for the GB model that permits separate covariate effects on the rapidity of early failure and the fraction of long‐term survivors. When effects are detected by both the CPH and GB methods, the attribution of the effect to long‐term or short‐term survival may change the interpretation of the data. We believe these examples motivate more frequent use of parametric survival models in conjunction with the semi‐parametric Cox proportional hazards model. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:8146895C2471AC3416D1A718FB6B67080565FF79
ark:/67375/WNG-1F774Q50-1
The City of Hope National Medical Center
ArticleID:SIM1273
NIH - No. CA-63265; No. CA-33572
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.1273