Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose

We explored how the effect of plasma membrane permeabilization by nanosecond‐duration electric pulses (nsEP) depends on the physical characteristics of exposure. The resting membrane resistance (Rm) and membrane potential (MP) were measured in cultured GH3 and CHO cells by conventional whole‐cell pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioelectromagnetics Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 92 - 99
Main Authors Ibey, Bennett L., Xiao, Shu, Schoenbach, Karl H., Murphy, Michael R., Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.02.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We explored how the effect of plasma membrane permeabilization by nanosecond‐duration electric pulses (nsEP) depends on the physical characteristics of exposure. The resting membrane resistance (Rm) and membrane potential (MP) were measured in cultured GH3 and CHO cells by conventional whole‐cell patch‐clamp technique. Intact cells were exposed to a single nsEP (60 or 600 ns duration, 0–22 kV/cm), followed by patch‐clamp measurements after a 2–3 min delay. Consistent with earlier findings, nsEP caused long‐lasting Rm decrease, accompanied by the loss of MP. The threshold for these effects was about 6 kV/cm for 60 ns pulses, and about 1 kV/cm for 600 ns pulses. Further analysis established that it was neither pulse duration nor the E‐field amplitude per se, but the absorbed dose that determined the magnitude of the biological effect. In other words, exposure to nsEP at either pulse duration caused equal effects if the absorbed doses were equal. The threshold absorbed dose to produce plasma membrane effects in either GH3 or CHO cells at either pulse duration was found to be at or below 10 mJ/g. Despite being determined by the dose, the nsEP effect clearly is not thermal, as the maximum heating at the threshold dose is less than 0.01 °C. The use of the absorbed dose as a universal exposure metric may help to compare and quantify nsEP sensitivity of different cell types and of cells in different physiological conditions. The absorbed dose may also prove to be a more useful metric than the incident E‐field in determining safety limits for high peak, low average power EMF emissions. Bioelectromagnetics 30:92–99, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:National Cancer Institute (NIH) - No. R01CA125482
ark:/67375/WNG-MBW9CLNS-1
Michael R. Murphy (Air Force Research Laboratory Fellows)
ArticleID:BEM20451
HQAF SGRS Clinical Investigation Program (Neurological Impacts of Nanosecond Electric Pulse Exposure)
istex:EC943FEF336FACF15F640D53CE56CE441ACD6D85
ISSN:0197-8462
1521-186X
DOI:10.1002/bem.20451