Chemiluminescent determination of leukocyte alkaline phosphatase: an advantageous alternative to the cytochemical assay

The determination of leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) is used as an aid to diagnose many diseases in the laboratory. For example, it can be used to distinguish chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from other myeloproliferative disorders (particularly myelofibrosis and polycythemia) and leukemoid react...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical laboratory analysis Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 91 - 96
Main Authors Kanegae, Marília P.P., Ximenes, Valdecir F., Falcão, Roberto P., Colturato, Virgílio A.R., de Mattos, Éderson R., Brunetti, Iguatemy L., da Fonseca, Luiz Marcos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The determination of leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) is used as an aid to diagnose many diseases in the laboratory. For example, it can be used to distinguish chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from other myeloproliferative disorders (particularly myelofibrosis and polycythemia) and leukemoid reactions (LR). Traditionally, this test is performed with the use of subjective cytochemical assays that assign a score to the level of LAP. Here we present a nonsubjective, quantitative, sensitive, and inexpensive chemiluminescent technique that determines LAP based on the commercial reagent Immulite® (AMPPD). To validate this methodology, intact leukocytes obtained from 32 healthy subjects, nine CML patients, and nine LR patients were submitted to the optimized protocol. By measuring the light emission elicited by four concentrations of neutrophils, we were able to estimate the activity of LAP per cell (the slope of the curve obtained by linear regression). A high linear correlation was found between the chemiluminescent result (slope) and the cytochemical score. The slope for healthy individuals ranged between 0.61 and 8.49 (10–5 mV.s/cell), with a median of 2.04 (10–5 mV.s/cell). These results were statistically different from those of CML patients (range=0.07–1.75, median=0.79) and LR patients (range= 3.84–47.24, median=9.58; P<0.05). J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 21:91–96, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JCLA20140
ark:/67375/WNG-QCPNVDP3-G
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES: Brazilian Coordinating Council for Higher Education).
istex:912548444CCBF7B0EA1B57340FB4EB34C1E22295
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0887-8013
1098-2825
DOI:10.1002/jcla.20140