Hepatic parenchymal changes and histologic eosinophilia as predictors of subsequent acute liver allograft rejection

During the first episode of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation, centrilobular changes in liver biopsy specimens may be possible indicators of subsequent episodes of ACR, early chronic rejection, or acute graft loss. The purpose of this study was to identify differences betwee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLiver transplantation Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 214 - 219
Main Authors Demirhan, Beyhan, Bilezikçi, Banu, Haberal, A. Nihan, Sevmiş, Şinasi, Arat, Zübeyde, Haberal, Mehmet
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.02.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:During the first episode of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation, centrilobular changes in liver biopsy specimens may be possible indicators of subsequent episodes of ACR, early chronic rejection, or acute graft loss. The purpose of this study was to identify differences between the histopathological findings in liver biopsy specimens obtained during the first rejection episode in patients who subsequently developed further episodes of ACR and those who did not. The histopathological findings in 22 patients who had a single episode of acute rejection (group 1) were compared with those in 23 patients who had multiple episodes of acute rejection (group 2). Only the first liver biopsy samples of the latter group were taken into consideration. We assessed the predictive value of centrilobular necrosis, central vein endothelialitis, pericentral inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, cholestasis, hepatocellular apoptosis, lobular inflammation, the degree of portal eosinophilia, and characteristic portal tract features in poor responders to antirejection treatment. The time to the first episode of ACR and the rejection activity index were similar in patients in both groups. Hepatocellular apoptosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and central vein endothelialitis were common features of both groups. The incidences of pericentral inflammation, centrilobular necrosis, and portal eosinophilia were significantly higher in patients in group 2 than in those in group 1 (P < 0.05). Patients with pericentral inflammation, centrilobular necrosis, and marked portal eosinophilia during an initial episode of acute rejection may be more likely to develop subsequent episodes of ACR. Liver Transpl 14:214–219, 2008. © 2008 AASLD.
Bibliography:This study was presented at the 9th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology, which was held June 23‐29, 2007 in La Coruna, Spain, and at the 9th Meeting of the Turkish Transplantation Society, which was held July 4‐6, 2007 in Ankara, Turkey
Telephone: 90 312 212 6591; FAX: 90 312 212 7572
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1527-6465
1527-6473
DOI:10.1002/lt.21360