Comparison of different diagnostic methods in infants with Cholestasis

AIM: To evaluate different methods in differentiating idiopathic neonatal hepatitis from biliary atresia. METHODS: Sixty-five infants with cholestatic jaundice and final diagnosis of idiopathic neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia were studied prospectively from September 2003 to March 2006. A tho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 12; no. 36; pp. 5893 - 5896
Main Author Dehghani, Seyed Mohsen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology,Gastroenterohepatology Research Center of Nemazee Hospital,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran%Department of Pathology, Nemazee Hospital,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 28.09.2006
Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: To evaluate different methods in differentiating idiopathic neonatal hepatitis from biliary atresia. METHODS: Sixty-five infants with cholestatic jaundice and final diagnosis of idiopathic neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia were studied prospectively from September 2003 to March 2006. A thorough history and physical examination were undertaken and the liver enzymes were examined. All cases underwent abdominal ultrasonography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, and percutaneous liver biopsy. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of these various methods were compared. RESULTS: There were 34 girls and 31 boys, among them 46 subjects had idiopathic neonatal hepatitis (age, 61 ± 17 d) and 19 had biliary atresia (age, 64 ± 18 d). The mean age at onset of jaundice was significantly lower in cases of biliary atresia when compared to idiopathic neonatal hepatitis cases (9 ±13 d vs 20 ± 21 d; P = 0.032). The diagnostic accuracy of different methods was as follows: liver biopsy, 96.9%; clinical evaluation, 70.8%; ultrasonography, 69.2%; hepatobiliary scintigraphy, 58.5%; and liver enzymes, 50.8%. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that clinical evaluation by an experienced pediatric hepatologist and a biopsy of the liver are considered as the most reliable methods to differentiate idiopathic neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia.
Bibliography:Clinical evaluation
Liver biopsy
Biliary atresia
14-1219/R
R575.63
Idiopathic neonatal hepatitis
Idiopathic neonatal hepatitis; Biliary atresia;Clinical evaluation; Liver biopsy
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Dr. Seyed Mohsen Dehghani, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Gastroenterohepatology Research Center of Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. dehghanism@sums.ac.ir
Telephone: +98-711-6242534 Fax: +98-711-6265024
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v12.i36.5893