Feasibility, comprehensibility and acceptability of the VISION-Cog, a novel tool to assess cognitive impairment in visually impaired older adults: a cross-sectional pilot study in Singapore

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 13; no. 9; p. e072151
• Main Authors: Vu, Tai Anh, Fenwick, Eva, Doshi, Kinjal, Gupta, Preeti, Quek, Shin Yi, Chen, Christopher, Ting, Simon, Ng, Adeline S L, Yap, Philip, Yeo, Donald, Milea, Dan, Lamoureux, Ecosse
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.09.2023; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Aged; Blindness; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dementia; Feasibility; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Interviews; Neurology; Neuropsychology; Older people; Pilot Projects; Singapore; Vision, Low; Visual impairment; Singapore; dementia; neuro-ophthalmology; delirium & cognitive disorders; old age psychiatry; neurology
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072151

We pilot-tested the ually ndependent test battery f euro nition (VISION-Cog) to determine its feasibility, comprehensibility and acceptability in evaluating cognitive impairment (CI) in visually impaired older Asian adults. The VISION-Cog was iteratively fine-tuned through pilot studies and expert-panel discussion. In the first pilot study (Stage 1), we recruited 15 visually impaired and cognitively normal participants aged ≥60 years to examine the pilot VISION-Cog's feasibility (length of time to administer), comprehensibility (clarity of instructions) and acceptability (participant burden). We then presented the pilot results to the expert panel (Stage 2) who decided via agreement on a revised version of the VISION-Cog. Subsequently, we conducted a second pilot study (Stage 3) on another four participants to ascertain improvement in feasibility, comprehensibility and acceptability of the revised version. Singapore Eye Research Institute. Nineteen Asian adults aged ≥60 years with visual impairment (defined as near visual acuity worse than N8) were recruited. Revised VISION-Cog. The VISION-Cog was deemed feasible, taking approximately 60 min to complete on average. All participants agreed that the test instructions were clear, and the battery did not cause undue discomfort or frustration. The data collector rated all tests as very user-friendly (score of 5/5). Minor modifications to the pilot VISION-Cog were suggested by the panel to improve its safety, clarity of instructions and content validity, which were incorporated and iteratively tested in the second pilot study until no further issues emerged. Using an iterative mixed-methods process, we have developed a feasible, comprehensible and acceptable 5-domain and 9-item visually independent VISION-Cog test battery suitable to assist CI diagnosis in older adults with visual impairment. We will assess its diagnostic potential against clinician-based assessment of CI in subsequent phases.