Heritability of the Second to Fourth Digit Ratio (2d:4d): A Twin Study

• Published in: Twin research and human genetics Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 215 - 219
• Main Authors: Paul, Simon N., Kato, Bernet S., Cherkas, Lynn F., Andrew, Toby, Spector, Tim D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.04.2006
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Environmental effects; Environmental factors; Female; Fingers; Fingers - anatomy & histology; Heredity, Human; Heritability; Hormones - genetics; Human genetics; Humans; Maternal Exposure; Middle Aged; Phenotypes; Polygenic inheritance; Quantitative Trait, Heritable; Sexuality; Statistical methods; Twin studies; Twins; Twins, Dizygotic - genetics; Twins, Monozygotic - genetics
• ISSN: 1832-4274; 1839-2628
• DOI: 10.1375/twin.9.2.215

The second to fourth finger length ratio (2d:4d) has been the subject of much recent work and is thought to be related to diverse gender and hormone-related traits including sports ability, disease susceptibility, attractiveness and sexuality. It is established in utero and remains constant in adulthood. Familial clustering has been thought to contribute to the development of 2d:4d from early studies but no twin studies exploring heritability have been reported to date. In this study, a sample of 456 female twin pairs (148 monozygotic [MZ], 308 dizygotic [DZ]) aged 18 to 79 years was used to estimate the heritability of 2d:4d for the right and left hands. Finger lengths were derived from hand xrays. Variance components analysis was used to estimate and contrast genetic and environmental effects on this phenotype. The mean 2d:4d was 0.92 (SD = 0.001) for both hands. The MZ intraclass correlation was higher than in DZ (.66 vs. .35 for right 2d:4d, and .71 vs. .37 for left 2d:4d). The best fit model included additive polygenic and unique environmental effects (‘AE’ model), with no significant common environmental effects detected. Heritability was estimated to be approximately 66% for 2d:4d (95% confidence interval 0.5–0.78). These results suggest a substantial genetic contribution to the determination of this hormonally related skeletal ratio in women, which could be more influential than the effects of common prenatal environmental factors. However the current study design does not preclude the possibility of confounding between heritability estimates and unobserved prenatal effects.