Regulation of electrospun scaffold stiffness via coaxial core diameter
Scaffold mechanics influence cellular behavior, including migration, phenotype and viability. Scaffold stiffness is commonly modulated through cross-linking, polymer density, or bioactive coatings on stiff substrates. These approaches provide useful information about cellular response to substrate s...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta biomaterialia Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 1133 - 1139 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.03.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Scaffold mechanics influence cellular behavior, including migration, phenotype and viability. Scaffold stiffness is commonly modulated through cross-linking, polymer density, or bioactive coatings on stiff substrates. These approaches provide useful information about cellular response to substrate stiffness; however, they are not ideal as the processing can change substrate morphology, density or chemistry. Coaxial electrospinning was investigated as a fabrication method to produce scaffolds with tunable stiffness and strength without changing architecture or surface chemistry. Core solution concentration, solvent and feed rate were utilized to control core diameter with higher solution concentration and feed rate positively correlating with increased fiber diameter and stiffness. Coaxial scaffolds electrospun with an 8wt./vol.% polycaprolactone (PCL)-HFP solution at 1mlh–1 formed scaffolds with an average core diameter of 1.1±0.2μm and stiffness of 0.027±3.3×10–3Nmm–1. In contrast, fibers which were 2.6±0.1μm in core diameter yielded scaffolds with a stiffness of 0.065±4.7×10–3Nmm–1. Strength and stiffness positively correlated with core diameter with no significant difference in total fiber diameter and interfiber distance observed in as-spun scaffolds. These data indicate that coaxial core diameter can be utilized to tailor mechanical properties of three-dimensional scaffolds and would provide an ideal scaffold for assessing the effect of scaffold mechanics on cell behavior. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.025 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1742-7061 1878-7568 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.025 |