The Effects of Prostate Cancer Treatment on Role-In-Sex in Gay and Bisexual Men: Mixed Methods Results from the Restore-1 and Restore-2 Studies

Gay and bisexual men (GBM) with prostate cancer experience worse sexual and mental health outcomes following prostate cancer treatment than heterosexual men. Emerging evidence suggests that GBM may change their role-in-sex in response to treatment effects. The purpose of this study was to describe t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of sex research Vol. 60; no. 5; pp. 752 - 761
Main Authors Tatum, Alexander, Rosser, B. R. Simon, Wheldon, Christopher W., Torres, Maria Beatriz, Bates, Alex J., Haggart, Ryan, Konety, Badrinath R., Mitteldorf, Darryl, Polter, Elizabeth J., Ross, Michael W., Talley, Kristine M.C., West, William, Wright, Morgan M., Zhang, Ziwei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 13.06.2023
Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Gay and bisexual men (GBM) with prostate cancer experience worse sexual and mental health outcomes following prostate cancer treatment than heterosexual men. Emerging evidence suggests that GBM may change their role-in-sex in response to treatment effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of prostate cancer treatment on role-in-sex, to estimate the prevalence of such changes, and to determine the impact on quality of life and mental health. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 sexual minority prostate cancer patients. Then, we recruited 401 gay and bisexual prostate cancer patients into a study assessing the effects of rehabilitation. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis. Differences in quality of life and mental health outcomes were analyzed using multivariate analyses of variance. Prostate cancer treatment resulted in loss of role-in-sex for many patients. When changes in role-in-sex occurred, the shifts were predominantly from tops to bottoms. Those with a current top role-in-sex had significantly better sexual and mental health outcomes than either versatiles or bottoms. Clinical implications include the need for providers to ask about role-in-sex in order to address disparities in health outcomes by sexual orientation and to provide culturally appropriate care to sexual minority patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4499
1559-8519
DOI:10.1080/00224499.2022.2128027