Ancillary techniques to facilitate endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms

• Published in: Journal of vascular surgery Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 69 - 75
• Main Authors: Yano, Osvaldo J., Faries, Peter L., Morrissey, Nicholas, Teodorescu, Victoria, Hollier, Larry H., Marin, Michael L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2001
• Subjects: Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - epidemiology; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - epidemiology; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - epidemiology; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Stents; Vascular Surgical Procedures
• ISSN: 0741-5214; 1097-6809
• DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.116005

Purpose: The ability to treat abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms and thoracic aortic aneurysms may be limited by coexisting arterial disease. Device deployment may be impaired by occlusive disease and tortuosity of the arteries used to access the aneurysm or by suitability of the implantation sites. In this study we describe the auxiliary procedures performed to circumvent these obstacles and thereby enable endovascular aneurysm repair. Patients and Methods: Between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1999, 390 patients treated for aneurysm of the aorta with endovascular devices were entered prospectively in a vascular registry. Fifty (12%) of the 390 patients required adjunctive surgical techniques to (1) create or extend the length of the proximal or distal device implantation site or (2) permit device navigation through diseased iliac arteries. Auxiliary techniques used to extend or enhance implantation sites were elephant trunk graft (n = 2), the construction of renovisceral bypass grafts (n = 1), and subclavian artery transposition (n = 2). Plication of the common iliac artery at its bifurcation was performed in conjunction with femorofemoral bypass graft in nine patients to allow preservation of pelvic circulation by avoiding internal iliac artery sacrifice. Construction of a bypass graft to transpose the internal iliac artery orifice was performed in one patient. The auxiliary techniques used to facilitate device navigation were iliac artery angioplasty or stenting (n = 8), external iliac artery endovascular endarterectomy or straightening (n = 14), endoluminal iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 5), and the construction of an open iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 8). Results: Successful deployment of the endovascular devices was achieved in 49 (98%) of 50 patients. Auxiliary techniques were successful in providing access for endovascular device deployment in all 35 patients (100%). Mean follow-up for techniques to facilitate device navigation is 26 months for endovascular procedures and 42 months for the open bypass graft construction patients; no occlusions were observed at this moment. There were five patients with incisional hematomas that did not necessitate intervention. Fourteen (94%) of 15 patients underwent successful device implantation after the auxiliary maneuvers to enhance implantation site. Mean follow-up for implantation site manipulation is 28 months. One of the subclavian transpositions had a new onset of Horner's syndrome, two of nine patients who had common iliac artery ligated had retroperitoneal hematomas that did not necessitate interventions, and no colon ischemia was seen. The patient who underwent nonanatomic bypass grafting of viscero-renal arteries had a retroperitoneal hematoma that necessitated reexploration. Conclusions: Significant coexisting arterial disease may be encountered in patients with aortic or iliac aneurysms. Identification of coexisting arterial diseases is essential to help tailor the appropriate supplemental surgical procedure to allow the performance of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients who would otherwise require open surgical repair. (J Vasc Surg 2001;34:69-75.)