Electrochemical antimony removal from accumulator acid: Results from removal trials in laboratory cells
► In non-divided cells, antimony did not deposit at cathode due to oxidation of Sb(III) at anode. ► Copper and graphite were found to be the most suitable electrode materials for antimony deposition. ► Sb species covering electrode lowers deposition efficiency with time. ► Thus, periodical renewal o...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of hazardous materials Vol. 196; pp. 59 - 65 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier B.V
30.11.2011
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ► In non-divided cells, antimony did not deposit at cathode due to oxidation of Sb(III) at anode. ► Copper and graphite were found to be the most suitable electrode materials for antimony deposition. ► Sb species covering electrode lowers deposition efficiency with time. ► Thus, periodical renewal of cathode material is necessary. ► Calculated specific electroenergy consumption was relatively high. ► In contrast, absolute energy consumption was low due to small quantities of antimony removed.
Regeneration of spent accumulator acid could be an alternative process for crystallization, neutralisation and disposal. Therefore, for the first time in a study of the possibilities of electrochemical removal of antimony and accumulator acid regeneration on a laboratory scale, two synthetic and several real systems containing sulfuric acid of concentrations ranging between 28% and 36%, and antimony species were tested. Discontinuous electrochemical reactors with anion exchange membranes were successfully used in these experiments, which were conducted at a temperature of 35
°C. Removal of antimony using cells that were not divided by a separator, however, was not possible. In selected experiments, by varying the electrode material, type of electrolyte, and cell current, the concentration of antimony could be reduced from the range of 5
ppm to 0.15
ppm. This resulted in current efficiencies between 0.00002% and 0.001%, and in specific electroenergy demands between 100
Wh
L
−1 and 2000
Wh
L
−1. In other experiments on substances with antimony contents up to 3500
mg
L
−1, the current efficiencies obtained were more than a thousandfold higher. In contrast to the formally high relative energy consumption parameters absolute demand parameters are relatively small and favour the electrochemical method in small scale application. Besides plate electrodes, 3D-cathodes were used. Copper- and graphite cathodes produced the best results. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.073 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0304-3894 1873-3336 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.073 |