Transcriptional Characterization of Compounds: Lessons Learned from the Public LINCS Data

The NIH-funded LINCS program has been initiated to generate a library of integrated, network-based, cellular signatures (LINCS). A novel high-throughput gene-expression profiling assay known as L1000 was the main technology used to generate more than a million transcriptional profiles. The profiles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAssay and drug development technologies Vol. 14; no. 4; p. 252
Main Authors De Wolf, Hans, De Bondt, An, Turner, Heather, Göhlmann, Hinrich W H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The NIH-funded LINCS program has been initiated to generate a library of integrated, network-based, cellular signatures (LINCS). A novel high-throughput gene-expression profiling assay known as L1000 was the main technology used to generate more than a million transcriptional profiles. The profiles are based on the treatment of 14 cell lines with one of many perturbation agents of interest at a single concentration for 6 and 24 hours duration. In this study, we focus on the chemical compound treatments within the LINCS data set. The experimental variables available include number of replicates, cell lines, and time points. Our study reveals that compound characterization based on three cell lines at two time points results in more genes being affected than six cell lines at a single time point. Based on the available LINCS data, we conclude that the most optimal experimental design to characterize a large set of compounds is to test them in duplicate in three different cell lines. Our conclusions are constrained by the fact that the compounds were profiled at a single, relative high concentration, and the longer time point is likely to result in phenotypic rather than mechanistic effects being recorded.
ISSN:1557-8127
DOI:10.1089/adt.2016.715