Laser Surface Alloying of Austenitic 316L Steel with Boron and Some Metallic Elements: Microstructure

Austenitic 316L steel is known for its good oxidation resistance and corrosion behavior. However, the poor wear protection is its substantial disadvantage. In this study, laser surface alloying with boron and some metallic elements was used in order to form the surface layers of improved wear behavi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials Vol. 13; no. 21; p. 4852
Main Authors Kulka, Michał, Mikołajczak, Daria, Makuch, Natalia, Dziarski, Piotr, Przestacki, Damian, Panfil-Pryka, Dominika, Piasecki, Adam, Miklaszewski, Andrzej
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 29.10.2020
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Austenitic 316L steel is known for its good oxidation resistance and corrosion behavior. However, the poor wear protection is its substantial disadvantage. In this study, laser surface alloying with boron and some metallic elements was used in order to form the surface layers of improved wear behavior. The microstructure was studied using OM, SEM, XRD, and EDS techniques. The laser-alloyed layers consisted of the only re-melted zone (MZ). The hard ceramic phases (Fe2B, Cr2B, Ni2B, or Ni3B borides) occurred in a soft austenitic matrix. The relatively high overlapping (86%) resulted in a uniform thickness and homogeneous microstructure of the layers. All the laser-alloyed layers were free from defects, such as microcracks or gas pores, due to the use of relatively high dilution ratios (above 0.37). The heat-affected zone (HAZ) wasn’t visible in the microstructure because of the extended stability of austenite up to room temperature and no possibility to change this structure during fast cooling. The use of the mixtures of boron and selected metallic elements as the alloying materials caused the diminished laser beam power in order to obtain the layers of acceptable quality. The thickness of laser-alloyed layers (308–432 μm) was significantly higher than that produced using diffusion boriding techniques.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma13214852