Arterial trauma during central venous catheter insertion: Case series, review and proposed algorithm

• Published in: Journal of vascular surgery Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 918 - 925
• Main Authors: Guilbert, Marie-Christine, MD, Elkouri, Stephane, MD, MSc, Bracco, David, MD, Corriveau, Marc M., MD, Beaudoin, Nathalie, MD, Dubois, Marc Jacques, MD, Bruneau, Luc, MD, Blair, Jean-François, MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mosby, Inc 01.10.2008
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Arteries - injuries; Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neck; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Thorax; Wounds and Injuries - therapy
• ISSN: 0741-5214; 1097-6809
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.046

Background Percutaneous catheterization is a frequently-used technique to gain access to the central venous circulation. Inadvertent arterial puncture is often without consequence, but can lead to devastating complications if it goes unrecognized and a large-bore dilator or catheter is inserted. The present study reviews our experience with these complications and the literature to determine the safest way to manage catheter-related cervicothoracic arterial injury (CRCAI). Methods We retrospectively identified all cases of iatrogenic carotid or subclavian injury following central venous catheterization at three large institutions in Montreal. We reviewed the French and English literature published from 1980 to 2006, in PubMed, and selected studies with the following criteria: arterial misplacement of a large-caliber cannula (≥7F), adult patients (>18 years old), description of the method for managing arterial trauma, reference population (denominator) to estimate the success rate of the therapeutic option chosen. A consensus panel of vascular surgeons, anesthetists and intensivists reviewed this information and proposed a treatment algorithm. Results Thirteen patients were treated for CRCAI in participating institutions. Five of them underwent immediate catheter removal and compression, and all had severe complications resulting in major stroke and death in one patient, with the other four undergoing further intervention for a false aneurysm or massive bleeding. The remaining eight patients were treated by immediate open repair (six) or through an endovascular approach (two) for subclavian artery trauma without complications. Five articles met all our inclusion criteria, for a total of 30 patients with iatrogenic arterial cannulation: 17 were treated by immediate catheter removal and direct external pressure; eight (47%) had major complications requiring further interventions; and two died. The remaining 13 patients submitted to immediate surgical exploration, catheter removal and artery repair under direct vision, without any complications (47% vs 0%, P = .004). Conclusion During central venous placement, prevention of arterial puncture and cannulation is essential to minimize serious sequelae. If arterial trauma with a large-caliber catheter occurs, prompt surgical or endovascular treatment seems to be the safest approach. The pull/pressure technique is associated with a significant risk of hematoma, airway obstruction, stroke, and false aneurysm. Endovascular treatment appears to be safe for the management of arterial injuries that are difficult to expose surgically, such as those below or behind the clavicle. After arterial repair, prompt neurological evaluation should be performed, even if it requires postponing elective intervention. Imaging is suggested to exclude arterial complications, especially if arterial trauma site was not examined and repaired.