Lidocaine Toxicity During Attempted Epistaxis Cautery

Abstract Background Epistaxis is a common problem that occurs in up to 60% of the general population, and is a common emergency department (ED) complaint. The use of lidocaine for analgesia is common when cauterization is required for bleeds that are refractory to manual compression. Although the us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of emergency medicine Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 303 - 304
Main Authors Nicholas, Elizabeth, MD, Thornton, Matthew D., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Epistaxis is a common problem that occurs in up to 60% of the general population, and is a common emergency department (ED) complaint. The use of lidocaine for analgesia is common when cauterization is required for bleeds that are refractory to manual compression. Although the use of lidocaine is generally thought of as a benign intervention, it is not completely without risk. Case Report We present the case of a 19-year-old man who presented to the ED with persistent anterior epistaxis. He developed severe lidocaine toxicity resulting from topical anesthesia applied prior to intranasal cautery for the epistaxis. This toxicity, which manifested as seizures, bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, and emesis, was rapidly recognized and appropriately treated, with a good clinical outcome for the patient. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? We present this case to increase awareness among emergency physicians of the potential complications of the intranasal use of topical lidocaine, something that is generally considered a benign intervention. We also discuss the pathophysiology and management of lidocaine toxicity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0736-4679
2352-5029
DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.034