Socioeconomic status throughout life and body mass index: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Cadernos de saúde pública Vol. 35; no. 10; p. e00125518
• Main Authors: Vieira, Luna Strieder, Bierhals, Isabel Oliveira, Vaz, Juliana Dos Santos, Meller, Fernanda de Oliveira, Wehrmeister, Fernando César, Assunção, Maria Cecília Formoso
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: Brazil Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz 2019; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
• Subjects: Body Mass Index; Meta-analysis; PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; Review; Socioeconomic Status; Body Mass Index; Revisão; Metanálise; Metaanálisis; Índice de Massa Corporal; Situación Socioeconómica; Socioeconomic Status; Revisión; Situação Socioeconômica; Review; Índice de Masa Corporal; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 0102-311X; 1678-4464; 1678-4464
• DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00125518

This article aimed to systematically review the association between socioeconomic status according to the life course models and the body mass index (BMI) in adults. A review was performed following the guidelines of the PRISMA. The studies were identified in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS and Web of Science databases. The eligible articles investigated the association between at least one life course model (risk accumulation, critical period or social mobility) and BMI. In order to assess the quality of the selected articles, the NOS checklist was applied to each study. Eleven articles were selected for the systematic review, and seven articles were selected for the meta-analysis. The average score and the median in the NOS checklist were 6.4, within a maximum possible score of 8 points. The most used model was social mobility. Regarding meta-analysis, there was association between lower life course socioeconomic status and BMI among women. BMI mean difference (MD) was higher among those who remained with low socioeconomic status throughout life when compared with those who maintained a high socioeconomic status (MD: 2.17, 95%CI: 1.48; 2.86). Before that, the BMI MD was higher among those with upward mobility, compared with those who maintained a high socioeconomic status throughout life (MD: 1.20, 95%CI: 0.73; 1.68). The risk of overweight was also higher among women who maintained low socioeconomic status (summary RR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.05; 2.74); however, according to the GRADE, the studies presented very low quality evidence. For men, no association was observed. Having low socioeconomic status sometime during life is associated with higher BMI in adulthood.