Evaluating small failure probabilities of multiple limit states by parallel subset simulation

A novel subset simulation algorithm, called the parallel subset simulation, is proposed to estimate small failure probabilities of multiple limit states with only a single subset simulation analysis. As well known, crude Monte Carlo simulation is inefficient in estimating small probabilities but is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProbabilistic engineering mechanics Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 291 - 304
Main Authors Hsu, Wei-Chih, Ching, Jianye
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A novel subset simulation algorithm, called the parallel subset simulation, is proposed to estimate small failure probabilities of multiple limit states with only a single subset simulation analysis. As well known, crude Monte Carlo simulation is inefficient in estimating small probabilities but is applicable to multiple limit states, while the ordinary subset simulation is efficient in estimating small probabilities but can only handle a single limit state. The proposed novel stochastic simulation approach combines the advantages of the two simulation methods: it is not only efficient in estimating small probabilities but also applicable to multiple limit states. The key idea is to introduce a “principal variable” which is correlated with all performance functions. The failure probabilities of all limit states therefore could be evaluated simultaneously when subset simulation algorithm generates the principal variable samples. The statistical properties of the failure probability estimators are also derived. Two examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach and to compare with crude Monte Carlo and ordinary subset simulation methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0266-8920
1878-4275
DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.01.003