Resection of complex pancreatic injuries: Benchmarking postoperative complications using the Accordion classification

AIM To benchmark severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System(ASGS) in patients undergoing operation for severe pancreatic injuries. METHODS A prospective institutional database of 461 patients with pancreatic injuries treated from 1990 to 2015 was reviewed. One hundred and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 82 - 91
Main Authors Krige, Jake E, Jonas, Eduard, Thomson, Sandie R, Kotze, Urda K, Setshedi, Mashiko, Navsaria, Pradeep H, Nicol, Andrew J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 27.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM To benchmark severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System(ASGS) in patients undergoing operation for severe pancreatic injuries. METHODS A prospective institutional database of 461 patients with pancreatic injuries treated from 1990 to 2015 was reviewed. One hundred and thirty patients with AAST grade 3, 4 or 5 pancreatic injuries underwent resection(pancreatoduodenectomy, n = 20, distal pancreatectomy, n = 110), including 30 who had an initial damage controllaparotomy(DCL) and later definitive surgery. AAST injury grades, type of pancreatic resection, need for DCL and incidence and ASGS severity of complications were assessed. Uni-and multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS Overall 238 complications occurred in 95(73%) patients of which 73% were ASGS grades 3-6. Nineteen patients(14.6%) died. Patients more likely to have complications after pancreatic resection were older, had a revised trauma score(RTS) < 7.8, were shocked on admission, had grade 5 injuries of the head and neck of the pancreas with associated vascular and duodenal injuries, required a DCL, received a larger blood transfusion, had a pancreatoduodenectomy(PD) and repeat laparotomies. Applying univariate logistic regression analysis, mechanism of injury, RTS < 7.8, shock on admission, DCL, increasing AAST grade and type of pancreatic resection were significant variables for complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis however showed that only age and type of pancreatic resection(PD) were significant. CONCLUSION This ASGS-based study benchmarked postoperative morbidity after pancreatic resection for trauma. The detailed outcome analysis provided may serve as a reference for future institutional comparisons.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Jake E Krige, Professor, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa. jej.krige@uct.ac.za
Telephone: +27-21-4043072 Fax: +27-21-4480981
Author contributions: Krige JE designed and conducted the study; Krige JE, Jonas E and Kotze UK collected and analysed and interpreted the data; Setshedi M performed the statistical analysis; Krige JE, Jonas E, Thomson SR drafted the manuscript; Navsaria PH and Nicol AJ conducted critical revisions; all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
ISSN:1948-9366
1948-9366
DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v9.i3.82