Endoscopic spine surgery for obesity-related surgical challenges: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

• Published in: Asian spine journal Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 292 - 310
• Main Authors: Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat, Cholamjiak, Watcharaporn, Sarasombath, Peem, Sakti, Yudha Mathan, Wu, Pang Hung, Wu, Meng-Huang, Lu, Yu-Jen, Yau, Lo Cho, Ito, Zenya, Cho, Sung Tan, Chang, Dong-Gune, Lim, Kang Taek
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Society of Spine Surgery 01.04.2025; Korean Spine Society; 대한척추외과학회
• Subjects: discectomy; endoscopy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; obesity; Review; treatment outcome; 정형외과학; Obesity; Treatment outcome; Endoscopy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Discectomy
• ISSN: 1976-1902; 1976-7846
• DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0376

Obesity presents significant challenges in spinal surgery, including higher rates of perioperative complications, prolonged operative times, and delayed recovery. Traditional open spine surgery often exacerbates these risks, particularly in patients with obesity, because of extensive tissue dissection and larger incisions. Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative, offering advantages such as reduced tissue trauma, minimal blood loss, lower infection rates, and faster recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of ESS techniques, including fully endoscopic and biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and decompression, in patients with obesity and lumbar spine pathologies. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases yielded 2,975 studies published between 2000 and 2024, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in pain relief (Visual Analog Scale) and functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index), with comparable results between patients with and without obesity. Patients who are obese experienced longer operative times and have a slightly higher risk of symptom recurrence; however, ESS demonstrated lower rates of wound infections, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery than traditional surgery. These findings position ESS as a viable and effective option for managing lumbar spine conditions in patients with obesity, addressing obesity-related surgical challenges while maintaining favorable clinical outcomes. However, limitations such as study heterogeneity and the lack of randomized controlled trials highlight the need for further high-quality research to refine ESS techniques and optimize patient care in this high-risk population.