Nonlinear ABAQUS Simulations for Notched Concrete Beams

• Published in: Materials Vol. 14; no. 23; p. 7349
• Main Authors: Tawfik, Ahmed Bahgat, Mahfouz, Sameh Youssef, Taher, Salah El-Din Fahmy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 30.11.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: ABAQUS; Composite materials; Computer simulation; Concrete; concrete damage plasticity (CDP); Crack closure; Crack initiation; Crack propagation; Damage; extended finite element method (XFEM); external post-tensioning (EPT); finite element analysis (FEA); Finite element method; Fracture mechanics; Mathematical models; Post-tensioning; Propagation; Reinforced concrete; Simulation; Softening; Tensile strength
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma14237349

The numerical simulation of concrete fracture is difficult because of the brittle, inelastic-nonlinear nature of concrete. In this study, notched plain and reinforced concrete beams were investigated numerically to study their flexural response using different crack simulation techniques in ABAQUS. The flexural response was expressed by hardening and softening regime, flexural capacity, failure ductility, damage initiation and propagation, fracture energy, crack path, and crack mouth opening displacement. The employed techniques were the contour integral technique (CIT), the extended finite element method (XFEM), and the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT). A parametric study regarding the initial notch-to-depth ratio (ao/D), the shear span-to-depth ratio (S.S/D), and external post-tensioning (EPT) were investigated. It was found that both XFEM and VCCT produced better results, but XFEM had better flexural simulation. Contrarily, the CIT models failed to express the softening behavior and to capture the crack path. Furthermore, the flexural capacity was increased after reducing the (ao/D) and after decreasing the S.S/D. Additionally, using EPT increased the flexural capacity, showed the ductile flexural response, and reduced the flexural softening. Moreover, using reinforcement led to more ductile behavior, controlled damage propagation, and a dramatic increase in the flexural capacity. Furthermore, CIT showed reliable results for reinforced concrete beams, unlike plain concrete beams.