Assessment of Force Retention between Milled Metallic and Ceramic Telescopic Crowns with Different Taper Angles Used for Oral Rehabilitation

• Published in: Materials Vol. 13; no. 21; p. 4814
• Main Authors: Fischer, Caroline Adela Ingrid, Ghergic, Doina Lucia, Vranceanu, Diana Maria, Ilas, Stefan Alexandru, Comaneanu, Raluca Monica, Baciu, Florin, Cotrut, Cosmin Mihai
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 28.10.2020; MDPI
• Subjects: Biocompatibility; Biomedical materials; CAD; CAD/CAM; CAM; Ceramics; Cobalt; Cobalt base alloys; cobalt chromium alloy; Computer aided design; Computer aided manufacturing; computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM); Corrosion; Dental materials; Dentures; Evaluation; Friction; Laboratories; Manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Mechanical tests; Prostheses; Rehabilitation; Retention; retention forces; Systems analysis; Tapering; Teeth; Telescopes; telescopic crowns; Test equipment; Titanium alloys; zirconia; Zirconium dioxide; Germany
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma13214814

The present study assessed the retention forces corresponding to different telescopic systems used in removable prosthetic dentures. The telescopic systems were represented by Co–Cr alloy or zirconia-based primary crowns and Co–Cr secondary crowns. All crowns were manufactured using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology (CAD/CAM). Two types of reference abutment teeth (upper canine and first upper molar) were selected in order to obtain the telescopic crowns and two taper angles—of 0° and 2°—were used for the design of the crowns. A number of 120 samples of telescopic crowns were obtained and subjected to mechanical tests, following a specific protocol, on a mechanical testing equipment. The retention of the telescopic systems was evaluated for different sets of cycles (up to 360), represented by movements that simulate the intraoral insertion and disinsertion of the telescopic systems. The present study highlights that the telescopic systems in which the primary crown is made of zirconia ceramics presents more advantages than those made of Co–Cr. All telescopic systems studied, highlighted that by modifying the taper angle from 0° to 2°, the retention forces have decreased, irrespective of the materials used for the fabrication of the primary crown, suggesting that by using a taper angle of 0°, which is known to be ideal, more efficient, and reliable prosthesis can be developed. Thus, even though the ceramic–metallic telescopic system exhibited the highest retention, all telescopic crowns evaluated registered values between 2–7 N, indicating that they are suitable for clinical use.