Cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry

OBJECTIVES Our objective was to define the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Methods for early identification and optimal treatment of such patients have not been defined. METHODS The SH...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 1104 - 1109
Main Authors Thompson, Christopher R, Buller, Christopher E, Sleeper, Lynn A, Antonelli, Tracy A, Webb, John G, Jaber, Wael A, Abel, James G, Hochman, Judith S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.09.2000
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVES Our objective was to define the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Methods for early identification and optimal treatment of such patients have not been defined. METHODS The SHOCK Trial Registry enrolled 1,190 patients with CS complicating AMI. We compared 1) the cohort with severe mitral regurgitation (MR, n = 98) to the cohort with predominant left ventricular failure (LVF, n = 879), and 2) the MR patients who underwent valve surgery (n = 43) to those who did not (n = 51). RESULTS Shock developed early after MI in both the MR (median 12.8 h) and LVF (median 6.2 h) cohorts. The MR patients were more often female (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.004) and less likely to have ST elevation at shock diagnosis (41% vs. 63%, p < 0.001). The MR index MI was more frequently inferior (55% vs. 44%, p = 0.039) or posterior (32% vs. 17%, p = 0.002) than that of LVF and much less frequently anterior (34% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Despite having higher mean LVEF (0.37 vs. 0.30, p = 0.001) the MR cohort had similar in-hospital mortality (55% vs. 61%, p = 0.277). The majority of MR patients did not undergo mitral valve surgery. Those undergoing surgery exhibited higher mean LVEF than those not undergoing surgery; nevertheless, 39% died in hospital. CONCLUSIONS The data highlight opportunities for early identification and intervention to potentially decrease the devastating mortality and morbidity of severe post-myocardial infarction MR.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00846-9