A method of calculating physiologically relevant joint reaction forces during forward dynamic simulations of movement from an existing knee model

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 1143 - 1146
• Main Authors: Koehle, Michael J, Hull, M.L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2008; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Computer Simulation; Forward dynamic; Humans; Isometric Contraction - physiology; Joint reaction force; Knee; Knee Joint - physiology; Ligaments; Models, Anatomic; Movement; Musculoskeletal; Patellar Ligament - physiology; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; SIMM; Simulation; Stress, Mechanical; Knee; SIMM; Movement; Simulation; Joint reaction force; Forward dynamic; Musculoskeletal
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.020

Abstract In the commonly used SIMM software, which includes a complete musculoskeletal model of the lower limbs, the reaction forces at the knee are computed. These reaction forces represent the bone-on-bone contact forces and the soft tissue forces (e.g. ligaments) other than muscles acting at the joint. In the knee model integrated into this software, a patellotibial joint rather than a patellofemoral joint is defined, and a force acting along the direction of the patellar ligament is not included. Although this knee model results in valid kinematics and muscle moment arms, the reaction forces at the knee calculated do not represent physiologic knee joint reaction forces. Hence our objectives were to develop a method of calculating physiologic knee joint reaction forces using the knee model incorporated into the SIMM software and to demonstrate the differences in the forces returned by SIMM and the physiologic forces in an example. Our method converts the anatomically fictional patellotibial joint into a patellofemoral joint and computes the force in an inextensible patellar ligament. In our example, the rectus femoris was fully excited isometrically, with the knee and hip flexed to 90°. The resulting SIMM tibiofemoral joint reaction force was primarily shear, because the quadriceps force was applied to the tibia via the fictional patellotibial joint. In contrast the physiologic tibiofemoral joint reaction force was primarily compression, because the quadriceps force was applied through the patellar ligament. This result illustrates that the physiologic knee joint reaction forces are profoundly different than the forces returned by SIMM. However physiologic knee joint reaction forces can be computed with postprocessing of SIMM results.