Penetrating neck trauma and the need for surgical exploration: six-year experience within a regional trauma centre

There has been a shift towards conservative management of penetrating neck trauma in selected patients. A retrospective case note review of the management of penetrating neck trauma (2007-2013) was undertaken at our large teaching hospital and compared against best-evidenced practice. Sixty-three pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laryngology and otology Vol. 131; no. 1; pp. 8 - 12
Main Authors Kasbekar, A V, Combellack, E J, Derbyshire, S G, Swift, A C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.01.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There has been a shift towards conservative management of penetrating neck trauma in selected patients. A retrospective case note review of the management of penetrating neck trauma (2007-2013) was undertaken at our large teaching hospital and compared against best-evidenced practice. Sixty-three patients were admitted over six years. The incidence of penetrating neck trauma is reducing, contrary to our belief. Most cases were knife inflicted (33 out of 63), and of these most were attempted suicide. There was a high rate of negative findings for neck explorations under general anaesthesia (18 out of 22). Only nine cases had justification for general anaesthesia exploration according to best practice. The rate of neck explorations under general anaesthesia has dramatically fallen, in line with best practice. The need for operative intervention in patients with penetration of the aerodigestive tract or a major vascular injury should be based on clinical features, and these have been shown to be reliable indicators prior to open exploration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2151
1748-5460
DOI:10.1017/S0022215116009506