Leveraging VA geriatric emergency department accreditation to improve elder abuse detection in older Veterans using a standardized tool
Elder abuse (EA) is common and has devastating health impacts, yet most cases go undetected limiting opportunities to intervene. Older Veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) represent a high‐risk population for EA. VHA emergency department (ED) visits provide a unique op...
Saved in:
Published in | Academic emergency medicine Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 428 - 436 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.04.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1069-6563 1553-2712 1553-2712 |
DOI | 10.1111/acem.14646 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Elder abuse (EA) is common and has devastating health impacts, yet most cases go undetected limiting opportunities to intervene. Older Veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) represent a high‐risk population for EA. VHA emergency department (ED) visits provide a unique opportunity to identify EA, as assessment for acute injury or illness may be the only time isolated older Veterans leave their home, but most VHA EDs do not have standardized EA assessment protocols. To address this, we assembled an interdisciplinary team of VHA social workers, physicians, nurses, intermediate care technicians (ICTs; former military medics and corpsmen who often conduct screenings in VHA EDs) and both VHA and non‐VHA EA subject matter experts to adapt the Elder Mistreatment Screening and Response Tool (EM‐SART) to pilot in the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center geriatric ED (GED) program. The cornerstone of their approach is an interdisciplinary GED consultation led by ICTs and nurses who screen high‐risk older Veterans for geriatric syndromes and unmet needs. The adapted EM‐SART was integrated into the electronic health record and GED workflow in December 2020. By July 2022, a total of 251 Veterans were screened with nine (3.6%) positive on the prescreen and five (2%) positive on the comprehensive screen. Based on the first‐year pilot experience, the interdisciplinary team was expanded and convened regularly to further adapt the EM‐SART for wider use in VHA, including embedding flexibility for both licensed and nonlicensed clinicians to complete the screening tool and tailoring response options to be specific to VHA policy and resources. The national momentum for VHA EDs to improve care for older Veterans and secure GED accreditation offers unique opportunities to embed this evidence‐based approach to EA assessment in the largest integrated health system in the United States. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Supervising Editor This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, The John A. Hartford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the Health Foundation for Western and Central New York. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Dawn Bravata ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization–Lena K. Makaroun, Jaime J. Halaszynski, Tony Rosen, Kristin Lees Haggerty, Jennifer K. Blatnik, Ruthann Froberg, Alyssa Elman, Christine A. Geary, Dyan M. Hagy, Crescencio Rodriguez, Colleen M. McQuown. Data collection–Colleen M. McQuown, Ruthann Froberg, Kristin Lees Haggerty. Data analysis–Colleen M. McQuown, Ruthann Froberg, Kristin Lees Haggerty, Lena K. Makaroun, Jaime J. Halaszynski, Tony Rosen. Data interpretation–Colleen M. McQuown, Ruthann Froberg, Alyssa Elman, Kristin Lees Haggerty, Lena K. Makaroun, Jaime J. Halaszynski, Tony Rosen. Writing, original draft preparation–Lena K. Makaroun. Writing, review and editing–Lena K. Makaroun, Jaime J. Halaszynski, Tony Rosen, Kristin Lees Haggerty, Jennifer K. Blatnik, Ruthann Froberg, Alyssa Elman, Christine A. Geary, Dyan M. Hagy, Crescencio Rodriguez, Colleen M. McQuown. Final approval–Lena K. Makaroun, Jaime J. Halaszynski, Tony Rosen, Kristin Lees Haggerty, Jennifer K. Blatnik, Ruthann Froberg, Alyssa Elman, Christine A. Geary, Dyan M. Hagy, Crescencio Rodriguez, Colleen M. McQuown. The corresponding author (Lena K. Makaroun) attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted. |
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.14646 |