Rat strain differences in stereospecific 2-oxidation of RS-8359, a reversible and selective MAO-A inhibitor, by aldehyde oxidase

Aldehyde oxidase catalysed 2‐oxidation activity of the (S)‐enantiomer of RS‐8359, a selective and reversible monoamine oxidase A (MAO‐A) inhibitor, was investigated in liver cytosolic fractions from ten rat strains. Remarkably large strain differences were observed with approximately a 230 variation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiopharmaceutics & drug disposition Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 247 - 255
Main Authors Sasaki, Takamitsu, Masubuchi, Akiko, Yamamura, Mayumi, Watanabe, Nobuaki, Hiratsuka, Masahiro, Mizugaki, Michinao, Itoh, Kunio, Tanaka, Yorihisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.07.2006
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aldehyde oxidase catalysed 2‐oxidation activity of the (S)‐enantiomer of RS‐8359, a selective and reversible monoamine oxidase A (MAO‐A) inhibitor, was investigated in liver cytosolic fractions from ten rat strains. Remarkably large strain differences were observed with approximately a 230 variation between the highest activity in the Wistar‐Imamichi strain and the lowest activity in the Slc:Wistar strain. The activities of Crj:SD and Slc:SD strain rats were considerably low, and that of the F344/DuCrj strain was very low. Among six Wistar strains, Crj:Wistar, Slc:Wistar, WKY/Izm, WKAH/Hkm, Jcl:Wistar and Wistar‐Imamichi, the Slc:Wistar strain rats showed exceptionally low 2‐oxidation activity that was comparable to that of the F344/DuCrj strain. The rat strain differences in the catalytic activity of aldehyde oxidase could correlate in part with the expressed levels of protein based on the mRNA of aldehyde oxidase. However, no small discrepancy existed in the almost negligible catalytic activity and the fairly high expression levels of protein and mRNA in the F344/DuCrj and Slc:Wistar strain rats. Some genetic factors might possibly be one of reasons for the discrepancy. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:22C969A01A8140565661A7C93B7E03372FF25ED7
ArticleID:BDD504
ark:/67375/WNG-LP5V3T7X-K
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0142-2782
1099-081X
DOI:10.1002/bdd.504