A Meta-Analysis of the Union-Job Satisfaction Relationship

The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic and quantitative review of the existing empirical evidence on the effects of unionization on overall job satisfaction. We conducted a meta‐regression analysis (MRA) with results from a pool of 235 estimates from 59 studies published between 1978 a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of industrial relations Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 709 - 741
Main Author Laroche, Patrice
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2016
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic and quantitative review of the existing empirical evidence on the effects of unionization on overall job satisfaction. We conducted a meta‐regression analysis (MRA) with results from a pool of 235 estimates from 59 studies published between 1978 and 2015. The accumulated evidence indicates that unionization is negatively related to job satisfaction but is far from being conclusive. When primary studies control for endogeneity of union membership, the results of the MRA indicate that the difference in job satisfaction between unionized and non‐unionized workers disappears. These results suggest that reverse causation (i.e. dissatisfied workers are more likely to join a union) and time‐varying endogenous effects play a key role in explaining the relationship between unionization and job satisfaction.
Bibliography: 
istex:5DA99B4DAE73397073D122C019539234F454B10D
ark:/67375/WNG-6V9WGBMP-J
ArticleID:BJIR12193
ISSN:0007-1080
1467-8543
DOI:10.1111/bjir.12193