Percentile values for flexibility tests in youths aged 6 to 17 years: Influence of weight status

The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of weight status on flexibility performance in Spanish youths (1475 boys and 1237 girls) aged 6-17 years, and to provide percentile values for two flexibility tests. Flexibility was assessed by the sit-and-reach and shoulder stretch tests. Pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of sport science Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 139 - 148
Main Authors Castro-Piñero, José, Girela-Rejón, María José, González-Montesinos, José Luis, Mora, Jesús, Conde-Caveda, Julio, Sjöström, Michael, Ruiz, Jonatan R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.03.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of weight status on flexibility performance in Spanish youths (1475 boys and 1237 girls) aged 6-17 years, and to provide percentile values for two flexibility tests. Flexibility was assessed by the sit-and-reach and shoulder stretch tests. Participants were categorized as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese. Girls had significantly better scores than boys in all the studied tests, except in the right-shoulder stretch test in the 6-7, 14-15 and 16-17-year-old groups, and in the left-shoulder stretch test in the 6-7, 8-9 and 16-17-year-old groups. There was not a significant positive association between weight status and flexibility assessed by the sit-and-reach test. However, overweight and obese youths had significantly lower performance than their normal-weight counterparts in the shoulder stretch test. Underweight and normal-weight individuals had similar performances for both shoulder flexibility tests. In conclusion, percentiles values of the studied flexibility tests might be of interest to estimate the proportion of youths with high or low flexibility levels, as well as to evaluate the effects of alternative interventions.
ISSN:1746-1391
1536-7290
DOI:10.1080/17461391.2011.606833